Accelerated Resolution Therapy (ART) and Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) are both trauma-focused therapies that use guided eye movements to help the brain reprocess distressing memories. They share the same roots, and on paper they can look nearly identical. In practice, they differ in how much you have to talk about the trauma, what happens inside a session, how many sessions you can expect, and how much research stands behind each one.

This guide walks through both approaches so you can have an informed conversation with a licensed clinician about which one fits your needs, especially if trauma is tied to substance use, anxiety, or depression.

Overview of ART and EMDR

EMDR

What is EMDR?

EMDR was developed by psychologist Francine Shapiro in the late 1980s.[1] It is a trauma-focused therapy built on the adaptive information processing model: the brain naturally works toward healing, much as the body heals a wound, but a traumatic event can overwhelm that system. The memory stays “frozen” in its raw form, stored with the original emotions, body sensations, and negative beliefs attached, and it keeps registering as a present threat rather than a past event.

EMDR uses bilateral stimulation, most often therapist-guided eye movements but sometimes hand tappers or alternating tones, to help the brain reprocess a target memory so it no longer triggers the same distress. The leading explanation for why this works is that holding a memory in mind while tracking a moving stimulus taxes working memory, which reduces the vividness and emotional charge of the memory as it is re-stored. Some researchers also compare the process to what happens during REM sleep, when the brain consolidates the day’s experiences. Both are working hypotheses rather than settled science, but the clinical results are well documented.[2]

EMDR follows an eight-phase protocol:

  1. History taking and treatment planning
  2. Preparation (relaxation and stabilization skills)
  3. Assessment (identifying the target memory, the negative belief, and body sensations)
  4. Desensitization (bilateral stimulation while holding the memory in mind)
  5. Installation of a positive belief
  6. Body scan
  7. Closure
  8. Reevaluation at the start of the next session

EMDR therapists are typically trained through EMDRIA-approved programs. The EMDR International Association (EMDRIA) sets training standards and maintains a certification hierarchy from basic training through certified therapist and approved consultant.[3]

What to expect in an EMDR session

Eye movements do not start on day one. Your therapist will spend the first sessions taking your history, building the therapeutic relationship, and teaching regulation skills such as a “calm place” or “container” visualization you can use if distress rises between sessions.

When you reach the desensitization phase, you and your therapist identify a target memory along with the image that represents it, the negative belief attached to it (“I’m not safe,” “It was my fault”), the emotion, and where you feel it in your body. You then hold that memory in mind while following the therapist’s fingers back and forth, holding buzzing tappers, or listening to alternating tones. Each set lasts roughly 30 to 45 seconds. Afterward the therapist asks, “What comes up now?” You share whatever surfaced, a thought, an image, a sensation, and the next set begins from there. The mind is allowed to move to related memories and beliefs, and the therapist follows. Sets repeat until the original memory no longer produces significant distress. Sessions typically run 60 to 90 minutes.

Accelerated Resolution Therapy (ART)

What is ART?

Accelerated Resolution Therapy was developed in 2008 by licensed marriage and family therapist Laney Rosenzweig, who trained in EMDR and built ART as a shorter, more structured approach. Training and certification are overseen by the Rosenzweig Center for Rapid Recovery, with the International Society for Accelerated Resolution Therapy (IS-ART) supporting research and professional standards.[4]

ART also uses therapist-guided eye movements, specifically smooth pursuit eye movements, where the client follows the therapist’s hand back and forth. Where ART departs from EMDR is a technique called voluntary image replacement. After the client has moved through the distressing scene and processed the body sensations that come with it, the therapist guides them to replace the original images with new, positive ones of their own choosing. The goal is memory reconsolidation: every time a memory is recalled it becomes briefly flexible before being stored again, and ART uses that window. The facts of what happened are retained, but the imagery and sensations that fuel the distress lose their grip.

ART draws on several existing methods, including guided imagery, brief psychodynamic techniques, Gestalt work, and elements of cognitive-behavioral therapy, all organized into a scripted, step-by-step protocol.[5]

What to expect in an ART session

An ART session is structured, directive, and often quieter than people expect. Many clients begin processing a target memory in their first active session.

Your therapist sits close and uses smooth hand movements to guide your eyes side to side, usually in sets of about 40 passes. You are asked to “play the movie” of the event in your mind from beginning to end. You do not have to describe what you are seeing; the therapist only needs to know when something comes up. If a physical sensation surfaces, tightness in the chest, a knot in the stomach, the movie pauses and you do additional sets of eye movements focused on that sensation until it settles. This is the relaxation response ART is built around: clearing the body’s reaction before moving on.

Once you can play the whole scene without distress, the therapist guides the voluntary image replacement phase. You choose new imagery for the scene. A client processing a car accident, for example, might picture pulling safely to the shoulder and watching the sun set. The therapist then checks whether the original images still carry a charge. Sessions usually run 60 to 75 minutes, and a single target memory is often resolved in one to five sessions.[6]

Therapist

Comparison of ART and EMDR

ART EMDR
Developed 2008, Laney Rosenzweig Late 1980s, Francine Shapiro
Core mechanism Smooth pursuit eye movements + voluntary image replacement Bilateral stimulation + eight-phase reprocessing protocol
Verbal disclosure Client does not have to describe the trauma out loud; imagery and body awareness are the focus Client identifies the target memory and negative belief and shares what surfaces between sets
Processing style Stays focused on the targeted scene; therapist keeps the visualization process on track Free association; the mind is allowed to move to related memories and beliefs
Structure Highly scripted, follows the same sequence every session Structured but more flexible; therapist adapts phases to the client
Typical treatment duration Often 1–5 sessions per target memory; layered or complex trauma involves more targets and a longer overall course Often 6–12 or more sessions for a full course; longer for complex trauma
Session length Usually 60–75 minutes Usually 60–90 minutes
Research base Smaller; several randomized controlled trials, mostly in veterans and service members Extensive; included in major PTSD treatment guidelines worldwide
Professional body Rosenzweig Center / IS-ART EMDRIA

Where they overlap

Both therapies rely on eye movements to reduce the emotional charge of a memory. Both treat the memory itself as the target rather than just the symptoms. Both work without homework and without requiring the client to write or repeatedly retell a trauma narrative, unlike exposure therapies such as prolonged exposure. And both are meant to be delivered by a licensed clinician with specific training, not by a general therapist who has read about the method.

Where they differ

How much you have to say. This is the difference clients notice first. EMDR generally involves some verbal processing: you name the target memory and the negative belief, and you report what surfaces after each set. ART has a non-verbal structure. You can work through a scene entirely in your mind, and the therapist only needs to know when the distress rises and falls. For people who are hesitant to disclose details, or who have tried talk therapy and felt “stuck,” this can make ART easier to start.

Free association vs. a focused scene. In EMDR, when the therapist asks what came up, your mind might jump from the target memory to an older one, or to a belief about yourself at work, and the therapist trusts that path. ART deliberately does not let the mind wander. It keeps you on the specific scenes of the targeted event, clears the body sensations as they appear, and then rescripts the imagery. Some clients value EMDR’s unexpected connections; others find ART’s predictability easier to tolerate, especially early in treatment.

What happens to the imagery. EMDR focuses on desensitization: the memory stays as it is, but it stops producing the same reaction. ART adds voluntary image replacement, where the client actively rescripts the distressing images. Some clients find this empowering; others prefer the EMDR approach of leaving the memory intact.

Pace and structure. ART is designed to resolve a single target memory in one session when possible, which is why treatment courses are short. EMDR moves at a pace set by the client and therapist, with more time spent in preparation and stabilization, which is often appropriate for childhood or complex trauma.

Evidence Based Therapy

Effectiveness and Evidence Base

Being honest about the evidence matters here, because the two therapies are not on equal footing yet.

EMDR has been studied for more than three decades across many randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews. The World Health Organization recommends it, alongside trauma-focused CBT, for adults and children with PTSD,[7] and the 2023 U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense guideline gives it a strong recommendation as one of three first-line psychotherapies.[8] The American Psychological Association’s 2017 guideline recommends it more cautiously, as a “conditionally recommended” treatment, a rating some researchers have argued undervalues the evidence.[9] Evidence supports its use for single-incident trauma and, with longer treatment, for multiple traumas and complex presentations.

ART has a smaller but growing evidence base. The most cited research comes from a series of studies led by Dr. Kevin Kip at the University of South Florida, including a randomized controlled trial in service members and veterans with combat-related PTSD. That trial, which enrolled 57 service members and veterans, reported significantly greater reductions in PTSD, depression, anxiety, and trauma-related guilt symptoms than an attention-control condition, delivered in an average of 3.7 sessions with a 94% completion rate, and gains held at three-month follow-up.[6] Subsequent studies have looked at ART for depression, trauma-related guilt, and sleep disturbances in military populations, and a 2017 literature review concluded that early results were promising but that the research base was limited to one RCT and two cohort studies, and that larger, high-quality trials were needed.[10] In 2015, SAMHSA’s National Registry of Evidence-Based Programs and Practices rated ART effective for PTSD and depression and “promising” for anxiety, phobia, and sleep problems; that registry has since been discontinued.[11] The 2023 VA/DoD guideline reviewed ART and concluded there was insufficient evidence to recommend for or against it, which is a statement about how much research exists rather than a finding that it does not work.[8]

What this means in practice: EMDR has the deeper research record and appears in the major PTSD guidelines; ART has credible early evidence and a shorter treatment course, but fewer studies and fewer studies outside military samples. Neither is a guaranteed fix, and neither works for everyone.

Practical Considerations and Applications

ART and EMDR in addiction treatment

Unresolved trauma is one of the most common drivers of substance use and relapse.[12] Many people drink or use to manage intrusive memories, hypervigilance, emotional dysregulation, or the shame attached to what happened to them. Treating the trauma directly, rather than only the substance use, is a core part of trauma-informed care.

Both ART and EMDR can be integrated into a comprehensive behavioral health program alongside individual therapy, group work, and relapse prevention. At Recreate Life Counseling in Boynton Beach, trauma work takes place within partial hospitalization (PHP) and intensive outpatient (IOP) programming, where clients are at the facility several days a week but return home or to sober living in the evenings. That schedule suits both therapies. ART’s short course means a client can often complete work on a target memory within a PHP or IOP episode. That matters for engagement: dropout is common in trauma treatment, and a protocol clients are likely to finish is more useful than one they abandon halfway through. In the Kip trial, 94% of participants completed treatment. [6] EMDR can begin in PHP, continue through IOP as the schedule steps down, and carry on with an outpatient therapist after discharge without a break in the protocol.

Timing matters. Clinicians assess for stability before starting either therapy. Someone still in early withdrawal, or without basic coping skills and a sober support structure in place, is usually not ready to reprocess trauma. An individualized assessment that accounts for trauma history, symptom severity, and current substance use comes first, and it is one of the reasons trauma-focused therapy is typically introduced after a client has settled into the program rather than in the first days.

PTSD

Who tends to do well with ART

  • Adults with PTSD or trauma-related conditions from a single incident or a defined set of events
  • Clients with co-occurring substance use disorders who need trauma work that fits a short treatment window
  • Veterans and first responders, the population where most ART research has been done
  • People with anxiety, depression, grief, or intrusive memories tied to a specific experience
  • Clients who do not want to talk through the details of what happened
  • People with intrusive visual flashbacks or nightmares tied to specific scenes
  • People who have felt stuck in traditional talk therapy

Who may be better suited to EMDR

  • Clients with childhood or complex trauma who benefit from an extended preparation and stabilization phase
  • People who want a therapy with the largest evidence base and the widest guideline support
  • Clients who prefer processing the memory verbally with their therapist, or who value the insight that comes from free association
  • Clients who want time to build trust before approaching the trauma directly
  • Situations where insurance coverage or a referral requires a guideline-recommended treatment

Potential drawbacks of each

ART’s structured, rapid approach can feel too fast for some clients, and its smaller research base means less is known about long-term outcomes across diverse populations. EMDR’s longer course requires more sessions and more time commitment, and the desensitization phase can be emotionally intense, which is one reason the preparation phase exists. Both can temporarily stir up distress between sessions; a good clinician will plan for that.

Choosing the Right Therapy

There is no universal answer. The right choice depends on your trauma history, how much you want to disclose, the timeline you are working within, and what is available where you are being treated. A few questions worth raising with your clinician:

  • Is my trauma a single incident or a longer, layered history?
  • How much stability and coping-skill work should come before we start?
  • How many sessions does the program realistically allow, and what happens after discharge?
  • Does my insurance coverage differ between the two?
  • Do you or your team hold specific training in the therapy you are recommending?

Many programs offer both, and some clients use them in sequence, for example, starting with ART during PHP and continuing EMDR in IOP or outpatient care.

find a therapist

Accessing Qualified Therapists

Because both therapies involve reprocessing traumatic memories, training matters. Look for:

  • EMDR: A licensed clinician who completed EMDRIA-approved basic training, which includes supervised practice hours. EMDRIA’s online directory lists trained and certified therapists.
  • ART: A licensed clinician trained through the Rosenzweig Center for Rapid Recovery, at minimum at the Basic ART level. IS-ART and the Rosenzweig Center both maintain directories of trained providers.

In either case, the therapist should conduct a clinical evaluation before beginning, explain the protocol, and be able to describe how the therapy fits into your broader treatment plan. Ask how they prepare clients for the eye-movement work, how they handle intense distress mid-session, and how many sessions they expect. Treatment programs that offer ART or EMDR typically handle insurance billing as part of the overall level of care, so ask the admissions team whether trauma therapy is covered under your plan.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is ART the same as EMDR?
No. ART grew out of EMDR and both use eye movements, but ART follows a shorter, more scripted protocol and adds voluntary image replacement. EMDR uses an eight-phase model and typically involves more verbal processing.
Which is faster, ART or EMDR?
ART is designed to be shorter, often 1–5 sessions for a single target memory, compared with 6–12 or more for a full course of EMDR. Those figures are per target memory: someone with a layered trauma history will have several targets and a longer overall course with either therapy. Faster is also not automatically better; complex trauma often needs the longer runway EMDR provides.
Does ART work better than EMDR?
There are no large randomized trials comparing ART and EMDR directly, so claims that one is better or faster for everyone are unproven. EMDR has far more research and appears in major PTSD treatment guidelines. ART has promising randomized controlled trial results, mainly in military populations, and a shorter treatment course.
Do I have to talk about my trauma in ART?
No. ART is structured so you can process the memory internally. Your therapist tracks your distress level and guides the eye movements without needing the details.
Does ART erase the memory?
No. You keep the factual memory of what happened. What changes is the imagery and physical reaction attached to it, so recalling the event no longer produces the same distress.
Can ART or EMDR help with anxiety, depression, or OCD?
Both have been used for anxiety and depression, particularly when those symptoms are linked to a specific experience. For OCD, exposure and response prevention (ERP) remains the first-line treatment; ART or EMDR may be used alongside it for trauma-related components, but they do not replace ERP.
Can these therapies help with sleep problems or intrusive memories?
Intrusive memories and sleep disturbances are core PTSD symptoms, and both therapies target them. Studies of ART in veterans have tracked sleep alongside PTSD symptoms and reported improvements, though results vary by individual.[11][13]
Will insurance cover ART or EMDR?
EMDR is widely recognized and generally covered as part of psychotherapy. ART is usually billed under the same psychotherapy codes when delivered by a licensed clinician. Coverage depends on your plan and the treatment setting; verify with your insurer or the program’s admissions team.
Can I do ART and EMDR together?
Not in the same session, but some clients use them in sequence under the guidance of their treatment team.
art therapy

The Bottom Line

ART and EMDR are close relatives. EMDR is the established, guideline-backed option with decades of research and a flexible eight-phase structure suited to complex trauma. ART is the newer, more compressed protocol that lets clients reprocess a memory without narrating it, often in a handful of sessions, and it fits naturally into short-term PHP and IOP programming. Many clients report rapid symptom improvement with either approach. The best choice is the one made with a qualified clinician after a proper assessment, as part of a comprehensive treatment plan.

If trauma is affecting your recovery, talk with the clinical team at Recreate Life Counseling about whether ART, EMDR, or another trauma-focused therapy belongs in your treatment plan.

References

  1. EMDR International Association. Training vs. Certification and history of EMDR therapy. emdria.org
  2. Carter C, Farrell D. A systematic review exploring the role of eye movements in EMDR therapy from a working memory perspective. EMDR Therapy Quarterly. 2023. etq.emdrassociation.org.uk
  3. EMDR International Association. Become an EMDRIA Certified Therapist: criteria and application. emdria.org
  4. Rosenzweig Center for Rapid Recovery. Accelerated Resolution Therapy: training and clinician directory. acceleratedresolutiontherapy.com
  5. Kip KE, Shuman A, Hernandez DF, Diamond DM, Rosenzweig L. Case report and theoretical description of accelerated resolution therapy (ART) for military-related post-traumatic stress disorder. Military Medicine. 2014;179(1):31-37. doi:10.7205/MILMED-D-13-00229
  6. Kip KE, Rosenzweig L, Hernandez DF, et al. Randomized controlled trial of accelerated resolution therapy (ART) for symptoms of combat-related post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Military Medicine. 2013;178(12):1298-1309. doi:10.7205/MILMED-D-13-00298
  7. World Health Organization. Guidelines for the management of conditions specifically related to stress. Geneva: WHO; 2013. who.int
  8. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense. VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for Management of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Acute Stress Disorder. 2023. healthquality.va.gov
  9. American Psychological Association. Clinical Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in Adults. 2017. apa.org; see also Dominguez SK, Lee CW. Errors in the 2017 APA Clinical Practice Guideline for the Treatment of PTSD. Frontiers in Psychology. 2017;8:1425. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01425
  10. Waits W, Marumoto M, Weaver J. Accelerated Resolution Therapy (ART): a review and research to date. Current Psychiatry Reports. 2017;19(3):18. PMID 28290061
  11. University of South Florida Health. PTSD therapy studied at USF College of Nursing receives official recognition by federal registry (SAMHSA NREPP). November 24, 2015. hscweb3.hsc.usf.edu
  12. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Trauma-Informed Care in Behavioral Health Services. Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) Series 57. Rockville, MD: SAMHSA; 2014. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  13. Pang T, Murn L, Williams D, Lawental M, Abhayakumar A, Kip KE. Comparison of Accelerated Resolution Therapy for PTSD between veterans with and without prior PTSD treatment. Military Medicine. 2023;188(3-4):e621-e629.

Written by: The Recreate Life Counseling Editorial Team

Published on: September 2, 2026
Updated on: September 3, 2026